![]() This is normal and is part of the Boost Algorithm used. Your CPU will not be able to boost as high as you increase the cores used. Stepping through increasing the cores you will likely discover 2 things:ġ. To test this you'd have to disable hyper-threading and run a single core for a few days on the same workload at a fixed clock-speed and record the results, then run 2 cores on the same workload and clock-speed and observe the results. running a task on each thread of a CPU's core) will not magically double your average yield but will likely result in a 20% or so increase in the overall per-core yield. Likewise, running a core at a higher frequency will yield more points in a given period.īut Hyperthreading (i.e. In general, yes, as you add more cores the total average credit will scale linearly. This is in-line with what I see as the typical yield for a single core of an R9 5900x and 3900x on WCG. In general, as your the first brave soul running Zen 4 on LHC you will have to monitor your yield as you make changes to find the optimal settings.įrom that chart you linked it shows a R9 7900x with 2 CPUs (cores) yielding 13,981.83 total average credit and 6,990.92 average credit per CPU (core). I'm trying to figure it out if I should get a 7950X So it must be the total amount of all the i7 2600 CPUs credits? So 16,506.30 / 21 = 786credits per i7 2600? Now there are also 21x i7 2600 CPUs that do 16,506.30credits per day. Now I don't know if this is the total amount of credits from everyone using the CPU. Now I have a AMD 7900X locked to 95W and I get this amount of credits 14,398.26, I'm also the only one using a AMD 7900X hehe. So I don't really understand how BOINC stats work, so I think that faster and more cores = more credits? I just assume credits = amount of tasks per day = more better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |